subskrybent kanałów informacyjnych
Apple Introduces "MacBook Wheel"
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
A TV Show Based On MAKE Magazine
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
How the City Hurts Your Brain
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Wyniki konsultacji rozliczeń usług IN TP i PTC
Stanowiska konsultacyjne w sprawie określenia warunków współpracy oraz zasad rozliczeń w zakresie świadczenia usług dostępu do sieci ruchomej PTC na numery sieci inteligentnej Telekomunikacji Polskiej.
NZ File-Sharers, Remixers Guilty Upon Accusation
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Nie widziałeś w telewizji?
Zimowisko w Trójmieście - Call For Papers
A Look Back At Kurzweil's Predictions For 2009
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Milky Way Heavier Than Thought, and Spinning Faster
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Tooth Regeneration Coming Soon
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Amazon S3 Adds Option To Make Data Accessors Pay
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Carefully Timed Jerks Could Power Space Elevator
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
ICANN Uses For-Profit Companies as "Comparables" in Its Employee Compensation
According to page 123 of ICANN's annual report:
d. Commitment to continued payment in the salary span of 50th to 75th percentile of for-profit market place of companies of a similar size and complexity to ICANN (the actual salary within this band determined by the individual's experience and talent and market position);
Note that the comparables have been "for-profit". This is obviously ridiculous, given the purported non-profit nature of ICANN, with its inherent job security. Indeed, ICANN has had major blunders, yet to my knowledge no staff were ever held accountable through termination or pay reductions.
The Economist magazine - Click to Enlarge
Source: Stephane Van GelderIn addition, by using the above criteria, ICANN staff know that they would personally benefit by increasing the size of the organization, thereby allowing themselves to be compared to a better "comparable" when determining compensation. This pro-size bias has already appeared to influenced ICANN policy formulation, for example rushing to roll out gTLDs which would bring in revenues to ICANN (and increased staff), despite the great opposition of the community. Indeed, ICANN appears to be promoting them as a fait accompli in media such as The Economist, with dog and pony shows to follow.
We see this spendthrift attitude in the ICANN fellowship program, where money is thrown away, even repeatedly to prior fellows ("Nine of the fellows are alumni from the past 5 programmes") while constituencies get limited or no support when they bear the brunt of the real input into policy work.
In conclusion, these bad incentives need to be corrected, through a more appropriate set of compensation principles. For example, the comparables should only include government and non-profit agencies. It is clear that things would get even worse if ICANN were to have its independence from US government oversight, and thus that oversight should continue indefinitely. Indeed, it is a slap in the face of consumers and the public that ICANN staff are feasting as if they are in a dot-com bubble company, rather than demonstrating the conservative financial and policy principles of non-profits and government agencies that are accountable to the public. Given the current economy, I am confident that ICANN will have no problems replacing any ICANN staff members who resign due to a reduction in salary to a level comparable to those in government or in non-profits.
Written by George Kirikos, President, Leap of Faith Financial Services Inc.. Visit the blog maintained by George Kirikos here.
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: Internet Governance, Top-Level Domains
We Value Your Opinion: Please participate in this quick survey
Employees the Next (Continuing) Big Security Risk?
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
China's Latest Internet Crackdown
Seven different government agencies, including the Ministry of Public Security and the State Council Information Office declared war on Internet smut today. 19 Internet companies, including Google, Baidu, Sina, and others, were cited for "violating public morality and harming the physical and mental health of youth and young people."
The official government online announcement is here. Another Chinese language report, including video of a TV report with footage of computer servers being confiscated by police at an unknown location and unknown time is here.
The meeting was chaired by Vice Minister Cai Mingzhao of the State Council Information Office (the same guy who met a few months back with Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales, and who has been emphasizing the need for strategic control of the Internet for the past few years in various speeches). According to Reuters:
"Some websites have exploited loopholes in laws and regulations," said Cai Mingzhao, a deputy chief of the State Council Information Office, who chaired the meeting, according to a report on an official news website (www.china.com.cn).
"They have used all kinds of ways to distribute content that is low-class, crude and even vulgar, gravely damaging mores on the Internet."
The Information Office is the government face of the Party's propaganda and censorship machine.
Cai told officials to "fully grasp the gravity and threat of the vulgar current infesting the Internet" and said law-breakers face "stern punishment."
Representatives of Google, Baidu, Sina, and others who journalists contacted as of this writing have so far had no meaningful comment.
It is of course unclear to what extent this anti-smut crackdown is or isn't going to lead to a tightening on politically sensitive content as well. Historically in China (if you can call the story of China's Internet "history"), the technology used to censor porn has ended up being used more vigorously to censor political content than smut. The Financial Times has a story today quoting He Zhaohui, marketing manager at TRS Information Technology, "China's leading provider of search technology and text mining solutions." According to the FT, He says TRS is "thriving on the government's desire to better "manage" public opinion, comes as the political leadership is facing growing challenges, mostly voiced through the internet."
The folks over at Danwei.org, who have been following Chinese media regulations for years, aren't about to get their panties in a twist over loss of smut just yet. Alice Xin Liu writes: "This campaign is very similar to countless content cleansing campaigns over the past few years. It does not signify much except that the Net Nanny is making sure everyone knows who is boss before the Chinese New Year starts." Jeremy Goldkorn points out that on the same day this campaign is announced, the People's Daily website among others ran racy photos of Zhang Ziyi. Heck, it wasn't long ago that Xinhua was known widely around the China expat web as "Skinhua”… How quickly people forget…
I heard from a couple of reporters today who asked if there's been any other crackdown like this in the past. It seems that everybody has also forgotten the crackdown on video websites that took place last March, which caused the Chinese YouTube clone Tudou.com to go offline for 24 hours in order to upgrade its censorship and monitoring systems.
One reporter asked me whether this latest crackdown marks a new hard-line phase after the "relative freedom of 2008." I pointed out that the unblocking of a number of prominent foreign websites around the Olympics was only one part of the picture for 2008. Chinese domestic websites hosting blogs, chatrooms, and other user-generated content never let up on political censorship. It's just that foreigners only seem to notice what happens to foreign websites…
Written by Rebecca MacKinnon, Assistant Professor, University of Hong Kong. Visit the blog maintained by Rebecca MacKinnon here.
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: Access Providers, Censorship, Internet Governance, Policy & Regulation
We Value Your Opinion: Please participate in this quick survey
A Hacker's Audacious Plan To Rule the Underground
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
China Determined to Purify the Internet, Cracks Down on Google and Other Major Websites
The Chinese government broadened its recent effort to limit pornography on the Internet by criticizing 19 Internet companies by name Monday, including Google and Baidu, the providers of the two most popular search engines in the country.
A statement posted by early Monday afternoon on a government-run news site said the Ministry of Public Security and six other government agencies would work together "to purify the Internet's cultural environment and protect the healthy development of minors." A similar statement had been issued Dec. 5 but attracted little attention.
Read full story: International Herald Tribune
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: Access Providers, Censorship, Policy & Regulation
We Value Your Opinion: Please participate in this quick survey
Distributed "Nuclear Batteries" the New Infrastructure Answer?
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
ESA Embraces Open Source With New SAR Toolbox
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Ubuntu Kung Fu
Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Ostatnie odpowiedzi
5 tygodni 6 dni temu
6 tygodni 2 dni temu
24 tygodnie 6 dni temu
25 tygodni 8 godzin temu
25 tygodni 23 godziny temu
25 tygodni 1 dzień temu
1 rok 13 tygodni temu
1 rok 15 tygodni temu
1 rok 15 tygodni temu
1 rok 33 tygodnie temu